After a miracle run over the past 18 months in international cricket, Nepal’s luck ran out at the Asia T20 World Cup Qualifier, falling to Singapore in the final game to hand them progress to the Global qualifier in the UAE.

Let’s not pretend – Even a Nepal win on the last day may not have been enough, had reserve days been available in the tournament. Singapore may have reached an unassailable lead through a colossal Net Run Rate, had they been able to play their match against Kuwait.

The Nepalis have relied on one-off individual performances and the ever-present Paras Khadka too long, finally exposed by the improving standards across Asian cricket. Their loss to Qatar on Tuesday, a far more comprehensive defeat than the scorecard suggests, was a telling result, reflective of poor team selection and execution.

The celebrations after Singapore were presented the trophy (Jay Dansinghani)

For a number of years, bowling has been Nepal’s strength. Whatever total made with the bat, the likes of Shakti Gauchan and Basant Regmi were always able to defend through tight bowling. The emergence of a young Sandeep Lamichhane continued this trend, albeit with a more attacking approach to spin bowling than the previous two. Lalit Rajbanshi has emerged, with the fast bowling of Sompal Kami, Karan KC and now Abinash Bohora improving in this time.

Why then, with such frailty with the bat and a more reliable bowling corps now and in the recent past, did Nepal go with one batsman fewer into the Qatar match? Knowing how reliable the bowling attack is, shouldn’t you trust the bowlers you have, and give yourself insurance in the batting department? At least eight players in the eleven had bowled in international cricket, with ‘keeper Binod Bhandari the only player not to bowl in domestic cricket. While being one of few Nepali players that has improved with the bat, Sompal Kami batting at five was a huge error made by selectors. Karan KC, who made his famous 42 from 31 balls against Canada last year at WCL2 at number 10, walked out at number seven. In T20 or 50-over cricket, to maximise your chances in batting out the overs and posting an imposing total, players one to seven must be picked with batting in mind.

As Janak Prakash took an acrobatic catch on the rope to remove Sharad Vesawkar, and a regathered effort from Paraam removed Bhandari, it appeared that Nepal’s problems were finally costing them matches – that the cracks in their game were unable to be taped together anymore, by any last over, last partnership heroics. Karan KC’s chase at WCL2 last year, and the countless times of bowlers bailing out the team (with ball and bat), can only get a team so far. This was exposed after Singapore showed Nepal how to bat, by first doing their homework and executing their plans with panache.

To be fair, Nepal play international cricket with one arm behind their back at times. Stifled by little domestic cricket, their board hasn’t sorted out their issues for three years now. The latest word from sources involved in regional cricket in the country is that Nepal is trying to align 7-8 domestic regions for consistent national-level play, before trying to address problems higher up. That’s all well and good, though their is confusion as to whether Nepal need to address their issues from the top down, or the bottom up. With endless participation and youth talent coming through, from the outside it looks like this talent cannot flourish with no firm domestic structure. The board and the lack of organisation looks to be letting its country, its players and its huge fanbase down.

Various sources in Nepal give different opinions on what is keeping Nepali cricket down. Some blame nepotism in appointments and selections. Some attribute it to laziness. Either way, this situation is not new. Ad hoc measures are forced to accommodate the mouths to feed, which only continue to complicate the situation. Those perhaps with good intentions have offered players shares in T20 leagues and other ventures, though in an ideal world these players would be paid as players by franchises and leagues.

This was put together in a project for MyRepublica in 2017. While some things have been addressed, other agreements look years away from being made. (Daniel Beswick)

The other side of the double-edged sword in all this is that because players aren’t able to focus on playing and instead looking for other ways to better their lives. Technical errors have multiplied and ultimately the performances of players who are meant to be stalwarts have dropped. During their loss to Singapore, the dismissal of Gyanendra Malla in his standing sweep, and of Sharad losing his shape in the shot, say more about a lack of cricket than of their own technical flaws. Aren’t these fundamental things ironed out by practice and play? So, is it fair for these players to be asked of lofty success? Probably not. Why do the young players coming through look the most technically sound? Because they youth setup has allowed them to hone their game. This one of the few things the country has done right in recent times! For senior players, it’s a classic example of when a team stays still, they go backwards relative to the rest of the field. Singapore and their progress exposed this.

With this in mind, it is perhaps unfair to point the finger at the likes of Malla and Vesawkar. Starving for some more cricket to play, it is near impossible with no organisation to hone and develop their respective games. It’d be astonishing for Nepal fans to think that Paras Khadka, who still manages to churn out runs despite all this, could be an even better player with some stability from a functioning board.

One player who can’t jump on this excuse is Sandeep Lamichhane. Thrust into the limelight of franchise T20 cricket, the boy from Chitwan did not shy away from the challenges of higher-level cricket. Across several continents, Sandeep has held his own, with numbers to match. In saying this though, Sandeep now faces new challenges which he has struggled to deal with. In what people refer to as ‘Second-year Syndrome’, he has gone from plucky challenger to a target for batsmen to take on with little to lose. Players and staff of opposing teams are able to sit down and analyse his bowling, devising plans of attack. Many have succeeded as the numbers show, as he finished with an economy of over eight and over for the tournament. In their de-facto final with Singapore, he returned figures of 0/34, with Rangarajan, Tim David and Ranjeet Singh toying with him. Teams with a clear plan in negating Sandeep’s threat by either coming down the track to play straight, or to stay and sweep, have had the most success.

What caused more concern was Sandeep’s response to being bashed around at the Qualifier, and his reactions to decisions not going his way. Several pundits and writers have noticed stroppiness come into his persona. While there is passion racing through him, he must channel it in the best way for himself and his team. With power and achievements comes greater responsibility.

Just like any other passionate fanbase, Nepal’s has shown their frustration through social media. Many have been measured in their responses, though some have not been as introspective. Blaming expats for other nations being stronger (despite players meeting eligibility requirements), some fans are blinded by their nation’s own cricketing shortcomings. It almost goes against the ‘Namaste’ mantra whereby people are not frustrated by things outside their control. Not only was Tim David born in Singapore, his dad also represented the country. If anything, Singapore should be praised for leaving no stone unturned in their pursuit of building their country’s cricket. To go one further, Nepal should be grateful they are even playing international cricket at all, after Zimbabwe were banned from the ICC and from playing international fixtures. This is happening while Nepali powerbrokers can’t decide how to run cricket in a country where most of their 30-million strong population can’t get enough of the product they have in their hands.

For Nepal cricket and its fans, this is hopefully the kick up the backside they needed. Even with Zimbabwe’s suspension from the ICC and a Global T20 Qualifying spot potentially opening up, finishing third at the Asian qualifier means it’s unlikely that Nepal will be thrown a lifeline if a makeshift repechage is put together. In the meantime, Lamichhane will be joined by Sompal Kami at the Canadian Global T20 in Brampton, representing Toronto and Winnipeg respectively.

By Daniel Beswick
Follow Emerging Cricket on Twitter and Facebook

3 COMMENTS

  1. i agree with most part but i have a few concerns :

    1. with a dysfunctional board, Nepal doesnt need a new captain, Paras is perfect in his role and performances, having watched him make nepal victorious like at TU stadium in 2009-2010. But even in T20, he should not open, he would be an more reliable asset at number 4, he is the best in associate at 4, i rate him even above mohammed nabi. Had Nepal gotten a good start and Paras and Sharad had batted together at 4 or 5 or 6 , results still could have been nail biting or nepal would have won.

    2. Dont compare nepal with Zimababwe or Kenya! yes, nepal’s cricketing body has been suspended but ICC is trying to resolve it and people in Nepal are as well. come to the jam packed stadium and you will get this. Hopefully, you wont get to write about CAN after October when ICC may lift the ban, a remote possibility.

    3. this is the best lot of cricketers nepal has got over the years. the past decade. failing at one/two global qualifiers dont mean a thing as what Nepalese look forward to is WCL (50-50), so judge Nepal cricket after that tournament when nepal gets enough of games.

    4. the reason ICC is helping Nepal is for their cause aka money. try to come and see few home games nepal play at their grounds. with 2-3 stadiums getting ready in coming years, we will definitely make a cut in 50-50 and hopefully retain ODI status. T20Is and not an yardstick, Nepal was into the game for 25-30 overs in the match against singapore despite losing by a huge margin.

    5. if you are comparing any players based on their stats, first let ICC give enough games to associate teams and let you compare. just one bilateral ODI series and we have won that. first T20I series drawn? do you want us to beat singapore, yes it can be done. Nepal have beaten them 9 out of 10 times in the past. one bad day and you write off nepal cricket, that is why you are an australian. can you compare Freddie (fliintoff) based on his figures/stats with ravindra jadeja or even any other all rounders? so lets talk about the impact rather than stats, hopefully Nepal will prove you wrong in coming days.

    6. of course some playes performed and some didnt, nepal captain has taken all the blame for this tournament and didnt single out players or management and ICC. Dont forget Nepal still ranks in current T20I rankings and have won most of the games given to them. so nepal still will play good cricket, if not great, in coming days.

    • Thanks for your response Vanity.

      1. There’s no doubt he is a good leader, but Paras at the moment feels the need to open because they’re struggling to find an opener. Yes, Nepal may have done better with him at four, but it’s merely a hypothetical because they lack depth in batting.

      2. Nepal were done for government interference just like Zimbabwe. It has nothing to do crowds showing up to TU (of which I have done myself!). Zimbabwe’s players have been unfairly made a victim in their interference.

      3 and 4. It’s a huge concern that a team of Nepal’s quality can win a bilateral series, and not beat Qatar. In fairness, Singapore beat them convincingly and in every facet.

      5. With all due respect, Nepal have just played a Qualifier against teams many thought would be no match, and an unfair comparison to a Flintoff/Jadeja comparison. For one, we’re talking about teams and not players for a start.

      6. As good as Nepal can be, many are scratching their head trying to figure out how they are ranked 11th in T20Is. Apart from this qualifier, they’ve only played one T20 series against UAE. From the cricket I have seen, I’m not sure if they’re better than Ireland, Scotland or the Netherlands.

      For as much as Nepal have achieved (and I have been quite vocal about that too, go flick through my tweets in recent years), it is important for me to call it as I see it. No point being blind and praising them all the time . At Emerging Cricket we aim to be fair in our reporting with all the news, quotes, insight and cricket that we see.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here